leica m240 vs m262 image quality

Source: DxOMark. It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. I find it to be a useful feature at times. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! Your previous content has been restored. There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. By With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. Very nice work. Source: DxOMark. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. The battery can be recharged and used over again. Your link has been automatically embedded. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. Turns out that was bollocks too! Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . That said, I do miss the live view feature. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Find out more about 35mmc here. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Clear editor. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. Your link has been automatically embedded. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. I need a new 50mm lens. This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Nice write-up. Thanks a lot for your replies. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Have a read of this for tips. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. In fact, I could almost go as far to say that even this stripped back Leica has too many buttons and options for my needs! 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. I would have thought that the overall condition of the camera is more important and would suggest that in the long run the choice of lens will make more difference to the pictures and enjoyment you can get out of it. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. I didnt discover this, despite that being how the M9 works. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. Image: Leica. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. You can post now and register later. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Be the first. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Help us by suggesting a value. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. Or pictures are completely similar? Both are great cameras and either would be fine. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. For the M240, forget it. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. Everything is very tactile. May be different sensor calibration? The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. I think I am veering towards the M262 with the Voigtlander Ultron35mm. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. If not, moderators please delete this post. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. I should say though, this is probably because none of my other digital cameras work like this if this was my only digital camera, I would likely have gotten used to a lot quicker. I know this is an old article but so what, I m commenting anyways. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. The body is pretty well weather sealed. It depends on your needs. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. This screen has very good focus peaking and an exposure waveform overlay that I find invaluable! My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. Is the 262 different in this regard? I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. Literally. When it comes to making video, things are different! M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. Learn how your comment data is processed. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. I love using that camera but want a digitals instant gratification and ease of image development (Im lazy). I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . The ideas with Leica is identities. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. This thing has live-view, and video. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. I will investigate that. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . Pasted as rich text. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Source: DxOMark. You and Roger Hicks. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. We think it rises to the challenge. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. More humble pie for me! I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. USA Distributor of MCM Equipment leica m240 vs m262 image quality Ive had it for a month now. I like to do a lot of still lifeand some close-up and macro work. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). It does make me wonder if they could have slimmed down this body like the M10, were they to have released this camera as a major upgrade rather than a stripped-back sidestep from the M240.